Home About Law & Grace Recent Articles

No One Should Be Required To Be A Law Abiding Citizen If The Manifest Illegal Conduct of Attorney Herschel C. Adcock, Jr. Remains Ignored

IN THE SAME MANNER as it is becoming hard to encounter someone who approves of ATTORNEY GENERAL ALBERTO GONZALES, it should be equally hard for court systems to continue affirming the manifest illegal actions of attorney Herschel C. Adcock, Jr., of Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

In addition to what is already posted throughout this website, the following facts and evidence demonstrates why if law enforcement authorities continue refusing to investigate and prosecute debt collector Adcock and his accomplices, every other person should be allowed to disregard any need for being a law-abiding citizen. In light of multiple OVERWHELMING PRIMA FACIE PROOF, nobody with sound mental faculties can believe frauds have not been committed by Adcock in connection with certain repossession and conveying of real estate property in Louisiana.

Although I have some comments about Mr. Gonzales and his INjustice Department, today’s posting is to further make plain Adcock’s criminal and deceptive practices in hopes that IN THE SAME REGARD AS NEW ORLEANS VIOLENCE IS ALARMING, SO IS ADCOCK! FURTHERMORE, IN LIGHT OF THE SCORES OF PEOPLE FACING FORECLOSURE, IT IS PATHETIC THAT NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE TO CURTAIL in-your-face LOUISIANA ILLEGAL REAL ESTATE AND DEBT COLLECTION ABUSES. Here are samples of verifiable facts from public records which show how Adcock used distressed property owners’ situation as means for illegal and unfair enrichment through fraudulent judicial proceedings:

**PRELIMINARY FACTS

1) Long before GE Capital Mortgage Services became defunct, on the date of February 2, 2002, when GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc., SOLD the Promissory Note (the security interest) for my property located at 4968 Lurline Street to Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, it ceased being the mortgage creditor; and thus ceased to have ANY right of action whatsoever. Accordingly, Adcock’s foreclosure proceedings by deliberate use of GE Capital’s name was fraudulent. Moreover, would an attorney who has been hired to collect a debt fail to name his client as the plaintiff, but instead name a plaintiff having no ownership? The subpoena (posted 01/20/07 in my “writ application”) would have exposed Adcock.

2) Wells Fargo was formerly the “servicing” company for GE Capital, but Wells ceased being the “servicer” to GE Capital regarding my property when Wells Fargo replaced GE Capital as owner of the security interest.

3) Despite that GE Capital Mortgage Services is a defunct mortgage creditor, to this date, Herschel Adcock is continuing to conduct legal and judicial proceedings by use of GE Capital’s identity.*In addition to Adcock’s unlawful and deceptive activities involving civil litigations, he also has filed countless deceptive and fraudulent bankruptcy court documents wherein Adcock utilized defunct GE Capital’s identity to fraudulently obtain bankruptcy judgments and “lift stay” orders.*

4) GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc., became defunct on October 25, 2002 and merged into GE Mortgage Services, LLC., acquiring that name and identity, just like DH Holmes is now Dillard’s.

5) Debt collector Herschel Adcock filed no other foreclosure lawsuits by use of GE Capital Mortgage Services after my September 2003 debt collection lawsuit was filed. If GE Capital Mortgage Services remained in existence as Adcock and attorney Sherrill Davidson falsified for purposes of obtaining the August 2004 summary judgment on behalf of GE Capital from Judge Lance Africk, other foreclosures under that name would have been filed. Instead, foreclosures began being filed in the merger name of GE Mortgage Services, LLC.

6) If GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc., continued to have been in existence, why were there no subsequent foreclosure proceedings up to the May 2005 date that the Lurline Street property purported was purchased by the phantom GE Capital Mortgage Service, Inc.?

7) Although corporations are required to registered as either foreign or domestic in order to do business in Louisiana, there is / was no registration of the phantom GE Capital Mortgage Services entity that was manufactured as “the successful bidder” at the purported year 2005 auction.
8) After GE Capital became defunct, automatically CT Corporation Systems ceased being its “registered agent.” On the other hand, the fact of Wells Fargo’s ownership and the fact that Wells Fargo’s “registered agent” is not CT Corporation System further shows there was no lawful grounds for CT Corporation Systems to accept service of lawsuits filed on September 2003 and October 2003 for non-existent GE Capital.

9) Defunct GE Capital Mortgage Services’ successor, GE Mortgage Services, LLC filed a voluntary withdrawal with the Louisiana Secretary of State on 6/22/05, apparently no longer caring to do business in Louisiana.

**FAST FACTS ABOUT BATON ROUGE ATTORNEY BRETT FURR

Abetting Adcock’s fraudulent practices is attorney Brett Furr. Brett Furr was / is a participant in a Baton Rouge White Collar crime/corruption case which is currently under Department of Justice and Internal Revenue Service investigation. As legal counsel of then Bank One (now JP Morgan Chase) Brett Furr, along with bank officials became privy to and concealed criminal activity along with the criminal record of a career white collar criminal which was withheld from their client, the victim who was undergoing chemotherapy for cancer. The concealment of this information provided the convicted felon the opportunity to execute crimes to shut down a hospital. These crimes included extortion, fraud, bank fraud, bankruptcy fraud, embezzlement, embezzlement from a bankrupt estate, wire/mail fraud, money laundering, and potentially securities fraud. After supporting the convicted felon’s bankruptcy liquidation plan for the hospital, Furr violated a court ruling and repossessed the property of the victim. JP Morgan Chase was subsequently sued. Furr lost a summary judgment and a subsequent appeal with the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals. According to sources, Furr has requested a new trial, vowing to run the victim out of money in legal expenses. The litigation continues even though JP Morgan Chase is not privy to the conduct of former Bank One officials it inherited, nor Brett Furr’s involvement and conflict of interest. Other participants in this case and their activities are part of a broader criminal and corruption network that have inflicted south Louisiana for over a decade. They are also subject to ongoing federal investigations.

ANOTHER THING ABOUT THIS ADCOCK - FURR CONFEDERACY IS THAT FURR’S MANDAMUS PETITION (discussed below on 05/08/07), is seeking Mandamus for what is RES JUDICATA. To be specific, Adcock obtained Summary Judgment in 2004, but Adcock failed to seek cancellation of my September 2003 Notice of Lis Pendens under provisions of La.CCP. art 3753. Then later, Furr obtained from Judge Englehardt dismissal for his Wells Fargo and Freddie Mac clients, yet Furr failed to request cancellation of my Lis Pendens. In fact, when Furr filed his convoluted “counterclaim” in my RICO lawsuit on behalf of Freddie Mac, he could have included a request to cancel my 2003 Lis Pendens. As such, the April 2007 Mandamus lawsuit which Furr has filed on behalf of Freddie Mac in an apparent attempt to mitigate any malpractice actions against him, should be thrown out of court in light of the clear language that cancellation was supposed to have been sought from the court which issued the judgments that Adcock and Furr requested and have already received!


**SAMPLES OF SPECIFIC ADCOCK CASES*GE Mortgage Services, LLC case samples:

In case# 2004-4580, a foreclosure proceeding was filed in year 2004. The auction was cancelled for case, GE Mortgage Services, LLC vs Esther McDowell Jones, et al, because the loan was “satisfied.” This case shows foreclosure suits no longer were filed by use of the name of “GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.”

In foreclosure case# 2002-1952, GE Mortgage Services, LLC vs Dawn Toi Rickett Elliott, for property located at 2 Heritage Lane Unit #8, Adcock obtained a seizure writ for $58,666.65 on 2/13/2003, and he purchased that property on 6/24/2004 for $4,000.00, On 1/10/2005 a refund of $440.00 was given to Adcock by the Orleans Parish Sheriff’s Office.
QUESTIONS: How is it possible for GE Mortgage Services, LLC to have acquired any benefit from that June 24, 2004 sale in an amount of $4,000.00? Because Adcock’s debt collector fee is 25% of the delinquent debt amount, plus the costs associated with filing the lawsuit and fees to the City of New Orleans revenue payable through the Sheriff’s Office, how could GE Mortgage Services, LLC benefit for its security interest? Furthermore, because Adcock’s foreclosure documents informing the defaulting property owner of his fee percentage, means that in this instance, Adcock earned at least $14,000 in collection fees for the property located at 2 Heritage Lane Unit #8, can GE Mortgage Services, LLC or any corporation afford to stay in business in Louisiana at such costs to people like Adcock –as well as being forced to indulge Adcock’s fraud as detectable from the GE Mortgage Services, LLC affidavit? When the $440.00 was given to Adcock, was it a disguised kickback?

**GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc., case samples (Note: throughout this posting, I use a shortened version, “GE Capital”):

(Note: throughout this posting, I use a shortened version, “GE Capital”):In foreclosure case# 2002-14747, GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc vs Kenneth Martin, Adcock obtained a writ of seizure on 9/19/2002 for a debt amount of $69,490.58. The 5334 Vermillion Street property was sold to Adcock on 1/3/2003 for $65,000.00. On 5/21/2007 a miscellaneous service was recorded by the Sheriff’s Office at a cost of $50.00 to Adcock still on behalf of the defunct GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc!

In foreclosure case# 2002-3340, GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. vs Lonnie Johnson, property located at 6043 Boeing Street, debt collectors George Dean and Adcock obtained a writ of seizure while GE Capital Mortgage Services was still in existence on 3/22/2002 for a debt amount of $36,999.04. But, by the auction date of 3/3/2005 GE Capital was no longer in existence. Adcock and Dean bought the property for $37,015.00. DESPITE THE FACT THAT GE CAPITAL CEASED TO EXIST ON OCTOBER 25, 2002, ADCOCK HAD THE 5/23/05 PROPERTY DEED UNDER CASE NUMBER 2002-3340 RECORDED IN GE CAPITAL’S NAME.

On October 16, 2003, attorneys for Judith Beaumont filed a federal lawsuit under docket number 03-2897 against GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc., et al. As per her attorneys’ request, two separate federal “Summons” were issued by the federal clerk’s office: one to Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and one to GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc., (apparently unaware that GE Capital was defunct.)

[A month earlier, I had filed in State Court debt collection lawsuit #03-14010 which was allotted to Judge Yada Magee (but Adcock UNTIMELY & deceptively removed my case from Judge Magee to federal judge Africk under docket number 03-3369). Service of lawsuits are required to be made upon the “registered agent” when a business is a corporation.]

According to the Secretary of State Corporations listing, GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc., ceased to exist on October 25, 2002


Due to the fact that GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc., could not possibly made those purchases of at the purported auctions of properties located at 5334 Vermillion Blvd, and 6043 Boeing Street, it is clear that Adcock carried out repossessing these properties via fraud, just as he did mine.

Due to the fact that GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc., possibly made those purchases of at the purported auctions of properties located at 5334 Vermillion Blvd, and 6043 Boeing Street, it is clear that Adcock carried out repossessing these properties via fraud, just as he did mine.The registered agent for GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc., was once CT Corporation Systems, located at 8550 United Plaza Blvd in Baton Rouge. In Ms. Beaumont’s case, and in mine, by CT Corporation Systems’ accepting service of those lawsuits, CT Corporation Systems created misrepresentation that service had been effected service upon GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc., and misrepresentations that GE Capital was not defunct. (For that very reason CT Corporation Systems is named as a defendant in my federal RICO lawsuit posted on this website. Like with the case of “the firefighters,” my action against CT was entitled to be tolled until 2005 when Paul Rumage told the court GE Capital Mortgage Services was defunct.)

Even more brazen is the fact that (like attorney Sherrill Davidson and Adcock did my 03-3369 case), Adcock obtained a federal court judgment for Beaumont’s case, despite that GE Capital Mortgage Services Inc., had ceased to exist years earlier! In fact, see below that on March 4, 2004, Adcock filed an Answer to Beaumont’s lawsuit on non-existent GE Capital’s behalf. The pertinent pages of those pleadings from the Beaumont case.


Judith Beaumont’s property was located at 2207 Audubon Trace, Jefferson, Louisiana, 70121. The bottom line for Ms. Beaumont, who might be a displaced evacuee like many of Adcock’s victims, is that she lost her lawsuit because of debt collection fraud and exploitation of GE Capital Mortgage Services’ identity.

Judith Beaumont’s property was located at 2207 Audubon Trace, Jefferson, Louisiana, 70121. The bottom line for Ms. Beaumont, is that she lost her lawsuit because of debt collection fraud and exploitation of GE Capital Mortgage Services’ identity.The appalling fact is that New Orleans court systems, and State Attorney General Charles Foti, and the New Orleans ‘justice department’ have been repeatedly informed about unlawful practices surrounding debt collectors. Also, on a national level that fact of Federal fines and scrutiny of Freddie Mac is telling of reasons why such a poverty and debt collection abuse is a problem in the City of New Orleans renown for corruption.

Further, New Orleans citizens once had reasons to believe a breath of fresh air had arrived in the likes of New Orleans U.S. Attorney Jim Letten, particularly when he began corralling several crocked judges and politicians. But the glaring questionable standstill especially regarding the whether or not federal Judge Porteous has done anything wrong, and others involved in the Operation Wrinkled Robe probe, is confusing. (A New Orleans 11/30/06 Times Picayune Editorial made a poignant point about Judge Porteous’ indefinite ability to stay off the bench and collect his judicial salary, see “Judge needed in court.”) Even further adding to my confusion about Mr. Letten, is some questionable matters involving certain assistance U.S. attorneys as well as Mr. Letten’s oral support of a U.S. Attorney General who goes to a man’s hospital bed for coercion purposes. (Also see, Jeremy Alford and Allen Johnson Jr.: “With Friends Like These” at http://www.bestofneworleans.com/dispatch/2007-04-24/news_scut.php)

–As it pertains to New Orleans’ CRIME CRISIS, such continual patronization and disregard for flagrant White Collar corruption is about as useful as trying to get persons over whose cases corrupt convicted New Orleans judges Ronald Bodenheimer, Robert Collins, and Alan Green presided to conceptualize the meaning of what lawlessness. *Also notable about the New Orleans federal “justice” department and Attorney General Gonzales’ blemished predicament are similarities in tones of impropriety and ongoing government cronyism. The tones from Mr. Letten’s office occurred when it arranged a “SUBSTITUTION” for federal Judge A.J. McNamara and thereby UNJUSTLY afford McNamara immunity for McNamara’s racist and tyrannical actions McNamara took without any federal subject matter jurisdiction after he confiscated my STATE COURT lawsuit for “Conversion” which Clerk of Court Dale Atkins and attorney Paul Rumage engineered from state court to McNamara’s FEDERAL COURT. (See my “Motion To Remand” posted below on June 6, 2006) However, Mr. Letten’s office did no “substituting” for bankruptcy federal Judge Douglas Dodd nor federal Lance Africk even though those federal judges are named defendants in my RICO lawsuit.*