LEHMAN BROTHERS’ Mortgage Troubles (nationally & locally); Evidence of Foreclosure Fraud, Deception, and Conspiracy with Wells Fargo; Deceptive Judicial Filings
Referring to a foreclosure case entitled: “Lehman Brothers Bank v. Clement Bailey,” case #2007-5610 in Orleans Parish Civil District Court, and New Orleans federal case #08-3881, entitled: “Wells Fargo v. Clement Bailey, JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, and Allstate Flood Insurance Program.” T
COPY OF THE LETTER Mr. Adcock (and others) wrote to JP Morgan Chase, is posted in this article.Â
This first exhibit here is from the Orleans Parish Civil Sheriff Docket record for the Lehman Bros. v. Clement Bailey foreclosure that was filed by debt collector attorney Herschel C. Adcock, Jr. Undeniably, this foreclosure case is asserting that Lehman Brothers owns the note for Bailey’s house. Among other things, as shown by docket entry number 10, on 11/30/2007 an “ADA” code was entered. A closer look into what that means is that amount due attorney reflects an amount to Adcock of $2,203.00.
The second exhibits are a letter dated October 10, 2007 written by Adcock to J.P.Morgan Chase, wherein Adcock informs that Adcock is representing -not Lehman Brothers’ interest in the Bailey property, but Wells Fargo; and a page from the Orleans Parish Civil Sheriff website pertaining to real estate auctions / seizures. [In Louisiana, the foreclosure attorney is often listed as “plaintiff.” At any rate, Adcock was clearly seeking $$$ from Chase Bank, Allstate, and Bank of America purportedly on Wells Fargo’s behalf while at the same time Adcock was maintaining a foreclosure case on Lehman’s behalf.
This third exhibit is page one of the lawsuit that Wells Fargo filed in state court against Bailey, J.P. Morgan Chase, Bank of America, and Allstate Insurance. (Defendant Allstate removed the Wells Fargo case to federal court.) Lehman Brothers is nowhere mentioned in that lawsuit. Not only does it appear that Wells Fargo is in conspiracy with Adcock to deceptively gain money from those defendants, those defendants are being forced to defend a sham lawsuit. In fact, the language of the entire lawsuit omits a whole lot as to why / how Wells Fargo is holder of the note.
============================================================================
**ALSO SEE: “IMPORTANT FACTS ABOUT FORECLOSURE AND MORTGAGE FRAUD”
**Keeping it real about: mortgage lenders, borrowers, attorneys @
http://www.open.salon.com/blog/wwwlawgraceorg/2010/10/30/foreclosures_-keeping_it_real_about_mortgage_lenders_b
3 Comments